Firstly, don’t be too hard on Mike Pence. Pence’s hands were tied constitutionally to accept the elector’s votes from the contested states once the House and the Senate had voted to accept the elector’s votes. Pence had no choice but to record those votes. It was too far in the system’s process for Pence to act. Moreover, if Pence hadn’t accepted the elector’s votes, the Supreme Court would have ruled Pence’s actions as unconstitutional. I believe that the Democrats were hoping that Pence would reject those elector’s votes so they could begin litigation against Pence. When I heard the theory that Pence could pick and choose what elector’s votes to accept, I knew that was folly. If the theory had been true, no first-term president could be voted out of office.
At the January 6th rally, President Trump said many things on election fraud that weren’t true. President Trump along with us were the victims of a disinformation campaign by the Democrats to hide the true election fraud. And because there weren’t any negative ramifications for the fraud in the presidential election, the Democrats repeated the same fraudulent pattern in Georgia’s Senate runoff races. I suspect the Democrats had help from the Central Intelligence Agency or a retired member from the agency that is familiar with how to rig elections in other countries. There are in evidence two indisputable facts in the public record that invalidate these two elections. 1. The ballot tallying process was done in secret in those key cities where the Democrats held sway. The Democrats accomplished this by the use of violence or the threat of violence to eject the observers from their posts. This was done despite the court’s ruling that it was unlawful to exclude these witnesses from the ballot tallying process. 2. Joe Biden said on October 24th, 2020, quote, “We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.” Neither Biden nor his campaign did correct that admission. Hear for yourself in the video clip below.
President @realDonaldTrump, what we witnessed in the election was a coordinated attack on the Republic by the Democrat Caliphate. pic.twitter.com/SMMql750tC
— DC Document Reports (@PacificReports) December 18, 2020
You are asking…why would Biden say this admission? Biden’s filter on what not to say is broken due to his brain trauma. Compare Joe Biden’s speech pattern in the below video clip. No stutter, Biden’s words flow easily.
We ask all former students and current students:
— DC Document Reports (@PacificReports) October 24, 2020
Is @JoeBiden worthy of your vote?
Joe cheated in Law School. Law School!
Joe is a theft.
Stealing ideas from others is the worst of all thefts. pic.twitter.com/N2AbngK7Yh
The courts also contributed to the belief that the voters were being disenfranchised. No court despite what the media and Joe Biden has said agreed to hear the fraud allegations that were brought forth by Trump’s lawyers, the states, or by concerned citizens. The courts used the principles of no standing and the doctrine of latches to turn those cases away. The courts set up the doctrine of the catch twenty-two. The doctrine of Latches states that the plaintiff should have brought the case sooner. Whereas, the no standing principle states that the case can’t be brought before the offense occurs.
Then the Democrats in tandem with the media used the sliding scale of fraud admissions. At first, they declare there was no fraud. Then it was there wasn’t any rampant fraud. However, they never denied targeted fraud in those key cities. Add all of the above to the destruction of computer logs and chain of custody records, it’s no wonder the citizen stormed the Capital Building.
Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Written by Mark Pullen.