Warren’s apology was missing an element that made her apology meaningless and insincere. Warren offered no restitution with her apology in Sioux City before the Native Americans. It is possible that Warren’s theft of tribal rights status meant that tribal members were excluded from a position at her colleges and her place of employment. An example: A person steals a car, they are found out, but they do not return the car nor do they pay the injured party the value of the car. The person only offers, I’m sorry. Warren is a multi-millionaire. Warren is seeking a tax on wealthy persons’ total assets. Those assets have been already taxed when they were acquired. If you believe it will stop with the wealthy and will not be applied across the board in the future, you haven’t been paying attention. Our point is, Warren is not leading by example. Warren says this wealth tax would pay for all persons’ college educations and thereby increase the size of the Middle-Class.
If Warren had been sincere in her displayed grief before the Native-Americans, then she would have made restitution in the form of her yearly salaries while she taught at Harvard. That restitution would have funded generations of tribal youths to attend college and thereby helped their tribe with their new knowledge.
Warren’s theft wasn’t a mistake.
Look at the Native-Americans on either side of Warren. Warren could not have believed she was a Native-American. She saw an opportunity and stole it. It doesn’t matter if she didn’t exclude any tribal members through her theft, her theft had value, she saw the value, and Tribal Nation should have been compensated for the Tribal rights status that she stole.
Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Written by Mark Pullen.