Blog

This was Wrays’ first appearance on the Hill post the 1/6/2021 Capital attack. The Democrat Senators tried their best to lead Wray to paint all of the 1/6/2021 Capital rioters as white supremacists. The Senators, as victims of the Capital attack, rightly focused on the attack. Speaking of victims, the Senators were the jurist on the impeachment trial of Donald Trump. Since when do we allow victims of a crime to serve on the jury for which they were victims? The Republican Senators were equally concerned over white supremacists, BLM, and ANTIFA violence. Whereas, the Democrat Senators completely ignored the violence that BLM and ANTIFA perpetrated across the country last summer to include recent events. That gave the appearance that BLM and ANTIFA are acting on the behalf of the Democrats if not at the direction of the Democrats.

Senator Whitehouse grilled Wray over the FBI’s failure to respond to questions from Senators. For too many years the FBI has acted as a fiefdom that is accountable to no one. Then the Democrat Senators shifted their questions to the 2020 election. Those Senators used Nazi playbook tactics to discredit any questioning of the election results. The “Big Lie” verbiage is straight from the Nazi playbook. Thus, anyone questioning the results of the election is painted as a Nazi. I’ll remind you that numerous Democrat Congresspersons objected to the 2016 election results and tried to block the electoral college vote tallying process. 

Those Senators asked carefully crafted questions about the election. One particular question stood out from all the others. The question; Director Wray, isn’t it true that there was no widespread voter fraud that would have changed the outcome of the 2020 election? Wray answered, yes. That question isn’t of concern to the public. Why wasn’t this question asked; Director Wray, is there any evidence that election officials in key cities in swing states engaged in election malfeasance? Those election officials gave the appearance of election malfeasance by doing the following; using the threat of violence to drive out witnesses to the vote tallying process. Covering windows to preserve the secrecy of the going-ons to the vote tallying process. Finally, destroying ballot custody and computer logs.