Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Researched and written by Mark Pullen.
I say this as a result of my review of his testimony as the director of the FBI. Senator Rubio did send his questions that he was going to ask Director Mueller a full two weeks in advance to Mueller. Rubio’s questions centered on GPS surveillance that the FBI conducts by placing transmitters on people’s vehicles or by tracking people through their smartphones. Mueller didn’t answer one of Rubio’s questions. To every question, Mueller answered, I don’t know. Rubio was not happy how Mueller had prepared himself for his testimony. In another of Mueller’s testimony before Congress, Mueller performed as a moron. Jim Jordan asked Mueller who, from the FBI, was heading the IRS corruption investigation. For those are not familiar with this scandal, the IRS had been weaponized to attack people & groups that were opposed to President Obama’s political views. Mueller didn’t know or wouldn’t tell who was heading the investigation. We also learned that the FBI was working with the IRS to intimidate & harass these people & groups. Jordan asked Mueller why FBI agents had interviewed these people months before the investigation had started. Mueller said I don’t know.
Trey Gowdy asked Mueller how long before FBI agents arrived in Benghazi to conduct their investigation. Mueller answered, two weeks after the attack. Gowdy then asked, “why so long?” Mueller answered, “there was insufficient security for his agents.” Gowdy then asked Mueller, “if there was not enough security for your agents, then why was our ambassador there in Benghazi?” Mueller said he did not know. Mueller was lying his ass off. The FBI has a paramilitary group that has the training & weapons for just this situation & Mueller could have asked the president for a battalion of Marines.
It is possible that Mueller was under orders to delay because Obama & Clinton wanted the time for all of the evidence to be destroyed or to be carried away. It is possible that Ambassador Stevens found out that we had destroyed Libya for the gold bullion that the country had in its’ possession.
The documents for your consideration.
Mueller went to Princeton University, had he prepared for his examines as he did for his appearance before Congress’ oversight committees the Princeton professors would have kicked him out of the University.
Updated as a result of Mueller’s testimonies before Congress on his report.
Important dates: 7/31/2016 FBI agent Peter Strzok opens a counterintelligence operation against candidate Donald Trump, code-named, Crossfire-Hurricane.
10/21/2016 FBI Director James Comey signs the first Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant application to spy on the Trump campaign through Doctor Carter Page.
11/8/2016 The presidential election.
5/9/2017 FBI Director James Comey is fired.
5/17/2017 Mueller is appointed as Special Council.
09/25/2017 Roger Stone testifies before the House Intelligence Committee.
3/22/2018 The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence publishes their report on Russian operations during the 2016 election cycle and a possible conspiracy/collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. The Committee reaches the same conclusion as Mueller a year earlier, no conspiracy, no collusion.
11/6/2018 The midterm elections for Congress.
12/7/2018 James Comey testifies before the COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
1/25/2019 Roger Stone is indicted for his alleged false statements to the House Intelligence Committee and alleged witness tampering.
2/14/2019 William Barr is sworn in as the United States Attorney General.
3/22/2019 Mueller closes his investigation.
It was evident that Mueller’s health and his intellect is in decline as seen from his performance during the two hearings. It is also evident that he didn’t write “his” report, nor did he read and retain the contents of “his” report. When did this decline begin?
Every person that has been following this investigation had their jaws dropped to the floor when Mueller said he didn’t know what Fusion GPS was or who owns it. Fusion GPS provided the genesis for the Trump collusion investigation. Crossfire-Hurricane was launched the day after Bruce and Nellie Ohr met with Glenn Simpson, CEO of Fusion GPS and British spy, Christopher Steele, author of what is known as the Steele dossier. The chart shown below was derived from the testimonies of: Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, James Baker, and Bill Priestap.
Nellie Ohr’s testimony on this meeting.
Mr. Jordan. All right. Talk to me about your interactions that you may have had with Christopher Steele.
Ms. Ohr. I met with him — I mean, Bruce brought me along to meals on, I believe, as I recall, three occasions with Christopher Steele.
Mr. Jordan. So you had three in-person meetings with Mr. Steele?
Ms. Ohr. Correct.
Mr. Jordan. Do you recall those dates? I mean, I know of one, but do you recall the dates of all those meetings?
Ms. Ohr. One of them was shortly after his first wife died. I don’t recall what — exactly what date that was.
Mr. Jordan. Let me back up. Were they all here in D.C. or where were the meetings?
Ms. Ohr. All in D.C.
Mr. Jordan. All right. And the first one was, you said, after Mr. Steele’s wife had passed?
Ms. Ohr. Correct.
Mr. Jordan. And you met here in D.C.?
Ms. Ohr. D.C.
Mr. Jordan. Were all these meetings between the — did all these meetings take place at the time you were working for Fusion?
Ms. Ohr. No.
Mr. Jordan. Okay. So how many of them took place between October 2015 and September 2016?
Ms. Ohr. Just the final — yeah, I think just the final one. I don’t remember the date of the second one.
Mr. Jordan. Okay. And the final one is what date, do you know?
Ms. Ohr. The final one, July 30, 2016.
Mr. Jordan. And that’s the one at the Mayflower Hotel?
Ms. Ohr. I’m sorry, I didn’t hear you.
Mr. Jordan. And that’s the one at the Mayflower Hotel?
Ms. Ohr. That made what?
Mr. Jordan. I’m sorry. That’s the one that took place at the Mayflower Hotel? I’ll speak into the mike. Is that right?
Ms. Ohr. Uh-huh. Yes.
Mr. Jordan. Okay. And who was at that meeting?
Ms. Ohr. Myself, Bruce, Chris Steele, and an associate of Chris Steele.
Mr. Jordan. Do you know that individual’s name?
Ms. Ohr. No, I’m sorry, I don’t remember it.
Mr. Jordan. So four people at the meeting.
Ms. Ohr. Right. Mr. Jordan. What did you talk about?
Ms. Ohr. His suspicions that Russian Government figures were supporting the candidacy of Donald Trump.
Mr. Jordan. Did you get any information at that meeting?
Ms. Ohr. Mainly that.
Mr. Jordan. No, I mean, did they actually physically give you any documents, any electronic communications, anything at that meeting —
Ms. Ohr. I don’t recall receiving anything, no.
Mr. Jordan. And what did Mr. Steele say about Mr. — then candidate Donald Trump and involvement in Russia and what Russia may be doing? Do you recall what was said?
Ms. Ohr. He was very concerned that his research had led him to the conclusion that Russian government figures had for a number of years been promoting the potential — a potential presidency of Donald Trump.
Mr. Jordan. Okay. So was the information given at that meeting, would you say that was what became part of, again, the now well-known document called the dossier.
Ms. Ohr. When I eventually read the dossier, I recognized that argument in there.
Mr. Jordan. Okay. So you did read the dossier?
Ms. Ohr. When it became public.
Mr. Jordan. Not before?
Ms. Ohr. No.
Mr. Jordan. Did you know why Mr. Steele was in town? Why he was in D.C. that particular weekend?
Ms. Ohr. I don’t.
Bruce Ohr’s testimony on Christopher Steele. My comments are in bold, within brackets.
Mr. Gowdy. Did Mr. Steele ever express his opinion on candidate Trump to you?
Mr. Ohr. At that time, I don’t recall, but later on, prior to the election when I spoke with Chris Steele, I got the sense he was very alarmed by this information, which I think he believed to be true. And so I definitely got the impression he did not want Donald Trump to win the election. {Steele testified in a London court that he didn’t know if anything in his dossier was true. So, what is Steele motivation to cause Mister Trump not to be elected as the United States President? The United Kingdom government has much to answer for, to include, the Queen.}
Mr. Gowdy. You got the impression or he told you that?
Mr. Ohr. I don’t remember specifically what he said, but it was a strong enough impression that I told the FBI that.
Mr. Gowdy. Have you had a chance to review your 302s?
Mr. Ohr. I looked at my 302s in preparation for my testimony with the Senate Intelligence Committee back in January of this year; and I did review them on one subsequent occasion, again, early this year. So I have seen them, but I have not looked at them for at least 6 months.
Mr. Gowdy. Do you recall whether it was you that Chris Steele said he was desperate that Donald Trump not win?
Mr. Ohr. I think I said that to the FBI, yes.
Mr. Gowdy. Was that your impression of him or is that something he said to you?
Mr. Ohr. I — I don’t recall exactly what he said, but, as I said, whether he said it directly or not, I had the very strong impression. I just don’t want to say words that I don’t remember right at this moment.
Mr. Gowdy. What does the word “desperate” mean?
Mr. Ohr. I think he was very anxious or very — very concerned that Donald Trump not win.
Mr. Gowdy. Well, “concerned” and “desperate” are two separate words. What does the word “desperate” mean?
Mr. Ohr. I think very concerned. And, again, I wanted to provide that to the FBI, because it was important that the FBI know what his mindset was. You want to know when —
Mr. Gowdy. If you’re relying on a source that says they’re desperate to prevent someone from winning, you would want to know that.
Mr. Ohr. Yes, of course.
Mr. Gowdy. How about willing to do anything to keep him from winning, do you remember seeing that in your 302, or words to that effect?
Mr. Ohr. No, I don’t recall that specifically, no.
Mr. Gowdy. Well, what do you — instead of me guessing what you recall, what do you recall Chris Steele telling you about Donald Trump and whether or not he wanted to see him prevail in November?
Mr. Ohr. As I told you, I don’t recall the exact words. I definitely had a very strong impression that he did not want Donald Trump to win, because he believed his information he was giving me was accurate, and that he was, as I said, very concerned, or he was desperate, which is what I then told the FBI. {This is Bruce Ohr being taken in by a spy to subvert the 2016 election.}
Mr. Gowdy. You don’t know if any of it was even attempted to be corroborated or contradicted? {This is about Steele’s dossier.}
Mr. Ohr. My assumption is that the FBI tries to corroborate the information if they think it’s something they want to pursue.
Mr. Gowdy. How would you know better than Comey? He said it was unverified. They didn’t even try to corroborate it until 2017.
Mr. Ohr. I don’t know what they had, what they were doing.
Mr. Gowdy. Who at the Department knew that you were talking to Chris Steele{Steele is a British spy} and Glenn Simpson? {Simpson, CEO of Fusion GPS, has taken contracts from the Kremlin to spread propaganda against other U.S. citizens. Google Bill Browler plus Fusion GPS.
Mr. Ohr. I spoke with some people in the Criminal Division, other career officials who dealt with some of these matters. So —
Mr. Gowdy. Any of them have names?
Mr. Ohr. Yes. So I was about to tell you. One of them was Bruce Swartz, who is the Counselor For International Affairs in the Criminal Division; a person who was working with him at the time, working on similar matters in the Criminal Division was Zainab Ahmad; and a third person who was working on some — some of these matters I believe was Andrew Weissmann.
Mr. Gowdy. Who is that last one?
Mr. Ohr. Andrew Weissmann. He was the head of the Fraud Section at the time. {Weissmann ran Mueller’s investigation. Weissmann is a surrogate of Hillary Clinton. It wouldn’t be a stretch to say Hillary Clinton started this bogus investigation because she paid a spy to gather lies from the Kremlin and through Weissmann was running this bogus investigation against President Trump for revenge because she lost the election.}
This page from Stone’s indictment is evidence toward Mueller’s knowledge that President Trump had not entered into a conspiracy with Russia to hack the DNC’s servers as the Steele dossier claims as true.
Director James Comey submitted this information to the FISC for a surveillance warrant to spy on candidate Trump and he renewed the warrant to spy on President Trump.
James Comey’s testimony as to whether President Trump did conspire with the Kremlin to hack the DNC’s servers. My comments are in bold, within brackets.
Mr. Gowdy. Did the FBI, in July of 2016, have any evidence anyone in the Trump campaign conspired to hack the DNC server?
Mr. Comey. Did we have evidence in July of ’16 that anyone in the Trump campaign conspired to hack the DNC server? The challenge in answering that is — and please don’t take this nonanswer to imply that there is such information. I just — I don’t think that the FBI and special counsel want me answering questions that may relate to their investigation of Russian interference during 2016. And I worry that that would cross that line, Mr. Gowdy. {If the FBI had evidence of this conspiracy, then this information would have been forwarded to Congress for impeachment before Mueller was appointed. Moreover, if this evidence had existed, then all the Trump haters in the FBI would have leaked this evidence to the media.}
Mr. Gowdy. All right. Well, I’m not asking you what happened after the initiation. July 2016, when this was launched, when Peter Strzok drafted the initiation documents, did the FBI have evidence at the time that any member of the Trump campaign conspired to access the DNC server?
Mr. Comey. And, again, the challenge with answering that is it’s a slope to answering questions about what we did or didn’t know about Russian activity and the connection of any Americans to it during 2016, and I think that implicates the same problem I just talked about.
Mr. Gowdy. Well, Director, we’re trying to understand what the factual predicate for launching a counterintelligence
investigation was.
Mr. Comey. Sure. I understand the gravamen of your question.
Mr. Gowdy. You can’t tell us, or you won’t tell us?
Mr. Comey. Probably a combination of both; that is, as I said in response to your earlier question, I don’t remember
seeing the opening memos on counterintelligence cases opened in late July, so I can’t recall exactly what the predication was. But, to the extent I recall facts developed during our investigation of Russian interference and the potential connection of Americans, I think that’s a question that the FBI doesn’t want me answering. So it’s both a can’t and a won’t.
See this page from the Inspector General’s report. See the FBI is filled with leakers. These FBI agents took bribes for information.
Mueller told two bold faced lies under oath that were easily detectable. Mueller was asked as to why he didn’t subpoena either Donald Trump jr. or President Trump. Mueller said he would have but for the time it would have cost to win the cases in the courts to compel them to submit to the subpoenas. In order to win a subpoena from a grand jury, the government must show evidence that a crime has occurred. Mueller would have sought subpoenas against these two men if he had evidence of crimes that were committed by these two men. Mueller had 22 months to seek a subpoena against Donald Trump jr. to question him on his participation in the meeting with the lawyer from Russia. There is no statute that states it is unlawful to listen to anyone, even a person from Russia. As for President Trump, he made request to his White House lawyer to replace Robert Mueller.
Judging from Mueller’s performance during the hearings, that was a wise request. Moreover, if we are to criminalize what is said to our lawyers in suggestions or request, then the framework of our legal system dies. The truth is the Democrats did accuse President Trump of committing a crime that carries the death penalty, that being treason. Eric Swalwell and John Brennan said President Trump is an agent of the Kremlin. Swalwell hasn’t retracted that assertion. Those Democrats who also echoed Swalwell’s unfounded accusation haven’t retracted their treason calls either. It is to be expected that a innocent President would do everything in their power to defend themselves from a death penalty charge. It is telling that not one prominent Democratic did express relief that President Trump had not colluded with Russia to steal the presidency, to the contrary, they expressed disappointment. Additionally, Mueller was asked if his investigation had been curtailed, hindered, or obstructed in any way. Mueller replied, “No.”
Mueller is an unindicted criminal.
If a citizen had altered evidence that was submitted to a court as Mueller did, then that citizen would have been charged with obstruction of justice.
Mueller and Comey claim Mifsud is a Russian spy. How is it that Mifsud was able to waltz in and out of the United States and be interviewed by Mueller without being detained? Mifsud is being reported as an asset of our intelligence community. If true, then that would explain as to why Mueller didn’t charge him for making false statements. Mueller had hard evidence in the form of emails and text messages, and still, he didn’t charge Mifsud. Mifsud being out of the United States doesn’t carry any weight because Mueller was all too willing to charge Russian citizens in Russia.
Mueller filed documents with the court that said as fact that the GRU and Unit 26165 did hack the DNC’s servers and network. Oddly, Mueller uses appear and appears, thus, casting doubt on the certainty of his claim. Note: No government agency was allowed to examine the DNC’s server or the their network. The FBI accepted a highly redacted report from the DNC’s contractor, CrowdStrike.
Look at these download speeds that Russia had available to them. 70 gigabytes is in the realm of a possible download operation without alerting the DNC’s I.T. staff, but a 300 gigabyte download operation is nearly impossible.
Mueller was asked if he looked at President Trump’s tax records. Mueller replied, I won’t discuss that. So, we don’t know for certain if he did or didn’t. But, Nancy Pelosi is stating as fact that Mueller didn’t review President Trump’s tax records. Soon after this question, Mueller was asked if he had requested an increase to the scope of his investigation, he said he had.
More damning evidence against Mueller. Lisa Page asked Peter Strzok to prevent the election of Donald Trump. Lisa Page was in the Special Councel office from the start of Mueller’s appointment. Moreover, she was privy to all of the intelligence that Crossfire-Hurricane developed. To be sure, Lisa Page would be labeled as a hostile witness for defense in a courtroom, hence, her testimony carries more weight in the realm of credibility.
I don’t believe it was happenstance that just after 36 days William Barr took office that Mueller closed the investigation. Mueller had declined so much that he wasn’t running the investigation. Barr soon after taking his office must have gone to the office of the Special Counsel to review the files. I suspect that took four days. He, Barr, then asked Mueller what he was doing. But for the appointment of Barr, I still believe Mueller and his team intended to run this investigation as long as Donald Trump was the President. The scramble came to be to write Mueller’s report to retroactively justify the 22 month long investigation that was predicated on the lie of collusion that ultimately came from the Clinton’s camp.
Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Written by Mark Pullen.