Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Researched done by Mark Pullen
This will be a continuing analysis of his testimony. We advise you to check back daily for new entries. We estimate that our analysis will be completed in two weeks.
We will tell the world what Strzok won’t. The FBI and everyone in Washington D.C. missed this text message of Strzok’s. We have worked in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF). Hence, we knew this was a serious security violation. He has his phone in the SCIF when he texted his reply to Lisa Page. She expressed no concern which led us to the conclusion that Strzok took his phone into SCIFs as a regular practice. We alerted the president through email and the FBI. Strzok was shortly thereafter walked out of the FBI’s headquarters, the Hoover building.
In this video testimony you will hear how serious Strzok’s security violation was for our national security.
We all know that the decision was James Comey’s to make, Strzok is behaving as though to utter Comey’s name is akin to Harry Potter saying Lord Voldemort’s name.
Oh sure, Strzok is certain now that he is under no pressure from a foreign intelligence service that he could not have been coerced over his affair with Lisa Page. Let’s examine Strzok’s metal. Strzok didn’t have the fortitude to tell his wife that he wanted sex outside of his marriage.
We were amazed that Strzok said this under penalty of perjury.
We draw your attention to the red box below in the text messages. According to Lisa Page’s testimony to the Inspector General, Lisa says this text message is in response to Strzok’s wife’s question as to why Strzok is texting Lisa at his home at a late hour. As we noted in our article, The activities of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, it is hard to understand how either of them got any work done. We reviewed the 500+ pages of their text messages. They were texting each other often within the same minute for hours. The level of compulsive behavior was astonishing. In our opinion, neither of them would have held up well under pressure from a hostile intelligence service. The FBI agrees with our assessment as they fired Strzok. Page was either pressured to resign or she saw the writing was on the wall and resigned on her own.
Here are the highlights from Strzok’s public testimony.
We suspect Strzok won’t be forthcoming even in a classified setting in regards to Crossfire-Hurricane. Look at the text message to the right. We found this message first, but we didn’t know the context. We showed President Trump and many Senators. The very next day Twitter exploded with the meaning. This was the groundwork for their operations against candidate Donald Trump. We suspect this is the use of human sources to lure the people in Trump’s orbit to say something to justify surveillance. That’s what happened to George Papadopoulos. The professor told him Russia had Hillary Clinton’s missing emails. The Professor primed Papadopoulos to repeat this to the Australian Ambassador. That supposedly launched Crossfire-Hurricane. Papadopoulos was scared when he was questioned and he thought the truth looked too bad, hence he lied. If Papadopoulos had told the truth or said nothing which was his right, he would not have been sent to prison for a couple of weeks. The two-week prison sentence speaks volumes to the fact that the judge saw that Papadopoulos had been set up. They tried the same entrapment with Doctor Carter Page. Carter Page told the truth. The FBI had labeled Carter Page as an enemy agent for Russia to the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The New York Times repeated this lie. Carter Page was not charged with any crime even though James Comey swore under oath to the FISC that Carter Page was an agent for Russia. We will display the Pages from the FISA application.
We invite you to review our article, The abuse of power by the FBI. You will see the Steele dossier was used to gain this surveillance upon Doctor Carter Page. We show side by side comparisons between the dossier and the Carter Page surveillance application.
We shall put Strzok’s faith in James Comey’s honesty to the test. For the documentation, please review our article, The unequal application of justice to cover a multitude of crimes.
The FBI’s agents & the DOJ’s attorneys looked away when HRC, Mills, Cooper, Abedin, and Combetta lied to them. HRC told two provable lies at her FBI interview:
1. HRC said she always secured the Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities (SCIF) at her two homes when vacant. The FBI’s report shows HRC had the regular practice of leaving the two SCIFs doors open. When HRC was away she would direct her staff to send classified content to her homes’ SCIFs. Marina Santos (no security clearance) or Justin Cooper (no security clearance) would be tasked to enter the SCIF(s) to collect the classified document(s).
2. HRC told agents that she never took her phone into the State Department’s SCIF. HRC’s office was in an area that was designated as a SCIF. The State Department’s security personnel told FBI agents that HRC had exempted herself from the no phones in a SCIF regulation. I was floored when I read this account. How could HRC possibly think no one at the State Department would not reveal her taking a phone into the SCIF? Especially because she abused the security staff. This lie of HRC’s was even worse than, “We landed under sniper fire” lie.
Both Cheryl Mills & Huma Abedin told agents that they didn’t know about HRC’s private email server that HRC used while at State. In the report, agents show both Mills & Abedin emails where they discuss problems with HRC’s email server. Even more astounding is the fact that both Mills & Abedin had accounts on HRC’s email server.
Compare his testimony below. James Comey destroys his own credibility.
We don’t believe “menace” is a reference to Russia. We have seen their feelings toward Donald Trump in their text messages. When Strzok opened the investigation on Donald Trump and the campaign, he had no credible information. This is evident from the FISA warrant on Doctor Carter Page which used the Steele dossier. Finally, Mueller’s report of no conspiracy between anyone in the Trump campaign and Russia shows Strzok’s true intentions and those that he answered to in the chain of command.
We like to compare testimony. Lisa Page says the “menace” is Donald Trump. We knew we were right. We draw your attention to the page on the right. All the underlining is useful information, however, the last green underlining tells us that there was no credible information to launch this investigation.
We continue to wonder why taxpayer dollars are being spent to shield Peter Strzok. FBI counsel won’t let Strzok answer if he took any actions in the Russia investigation before July 31st of 2016. Really, there were two investigations. Gowdy is referring to Crossfire-Hurricane. He and Lisa Page did take actions against the Trump Campaign as early as December 28th of 2015. That action is documented in their text exchange about OCONUS lures.
Strzok is being factual. Loretta Lynch did launch the Clinton email investigation with no targets, suspects, or persons of interest named and never named. This fact was revealed in the Inspector General’s report.
The page from the Inspector General’s report. We draw your attention to 1 on the report page
We draw your attention to the red boxes on the two testimony pages below. Strzok appears to be committing perjury.
Compare his testimony above to what he wrote to Lisa Page in this text message in the red box below.
Strzok affirms he didn’t text from inside of a SCIF. We present the text message you have seen before. It is below this transcript page.
Strzok responds to Lisa Page: In scif. One sec. Not at SCIF or by SCIF, but, In scif. We judge that as a confirmed perjury.
Lisa Page did text the “secret society” message to Strzok right after the 2016 election. It did come out in news reports that Director Comey did hold secret off-site meetings, the topics remain unknown. Do we believe this text is evidence of an FBI secret society? No. Strzok and Page aren’t bright enough to be recruited into a hypothetical FBI secret society. For just fun, we will apply logic to Strzok’s answers. We are disappointed in the poor display of logic by Ms. Kim.
We will show the questions that our researcher, Mark Pullen would have asked Strzok.
Mr. Pullen: You answered no to the question as to whether if the FBI has a secret society. How can you be so certain that the FBI does not have secret societies when by the very nature they are secret?
Mr. Pullen: If you were a member of an FBI secret society, then would you break your oath to the members and betray your fellow agents in the secret society?
Mr. Pullen: We have learned that you have given false testimony today in regards to your knowledge of the FBI’s misrepresentations in FISA warrant applications, additionally, you perjured yourself as to whether you did text with your phone from within a SCIF. How can we trust that you are being truthful now on whether you are a member of an FBI secret society? How can we trust in anything you say forward in your testimony?
When I read the secret society text message, it made me ponder, which I am paid to do.
We judge the next nine pages as the funniest transcript pages we have ever reviewed. We can hear Trey Gowdy shouting at Strzok in our heads. Strzok doesn’t hold up well under Gowdy’s questions which further proves he would have folded under pressure on his affair if and when he was targeted by a hostile intelligence service.
We do accuse the Department of Justice under Barack Obama’s leadership of concealing Hillary Clinton’s espionage activities. We do claim in our article, PSR formally accuses Hillary Clinton of running an espionage ring, that Hillary Clinton used her foundation as a clearinghouse for classified information.
With Strzok’s testimony, the clouds of confusion have parted for us. When we saw the sentence that is highlighted in yellow below in the Inspector General’s report page, we thought the investigators incompetent. We thought this because we have emails in our possession that Clinton sent or caused to be sent to persons who were not authorized to receive classified information.
Bob Goodlatte destroys Strzok with this question. Strzok falls flat on his face in his response.
We find Strzok’s lack of candor disturbing. Now that the Special Counsel has closed his investigation, Strzok must be recalled to answer the questions that he would not answer under the guise that it impact Mueller’s investigation.
Clinton’s server was breached. We showed you the Inspector General’s report page, below this transcript page we display the FBI’s report page.
If you recall, we mentioned that we examine Strzok’s metal. Below this transcript page, you will see Strzok’s weakness in his own words. How did he violate his integrity? Why was he was so weak that he did so? Was he blackmailed over his affair with Lisa Page to steer the Clinton investigation? Why has no Congressperson asked about these texts of Strzok’s?
