Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Researched done by Mark Pullen
This will be a continuing analysis of his testimony. We advise you to check back daily for new entries. We estimate that our analysis will be completed in five days.
We first became aware of Baker through our review of Peter Strzok’s and Lisa Page’s text messages that were released to the public. In our review of the 500+ pages, we saw indications that Baker, Strzok, and Page were leaking to the media. You can see the flagged text messages in our article, The activities of Peter Strzok & Lisa Page. Baker is under a criminal investigation for making false statements in regards to his interactions with the media.
Baker and Comey are friends. These two pages give a history to their friendship. (1) Does prove Comey lied to the people and Congress when he said the investigation was run independently from the Justice Department. See our article, Our analysis of Peter Strzok’s testimony. In this article, Strzok testifies that the Department of Justice did band the FBI from looking at emails that were sent to or from the Clinton Foundation. We show two classified emails that were sent to the CF. Additionally, we show a Strzok text message where he is complaining to Page that the DOJ has ordered the FBI to narrow the scope of the investigation. That’s the Clinton email investigation.
These five pages are showing how the conspiracy worked to get disinformation from Hillary Clinton and the DNC to the FBI after Christopher Steele was fired as an informant.
It might be that James Baker’s legal issues are just beginning.
This is stunning testimony. James Baker co-opted Bruce Ohr, a DOJ employee, into being a conduit for Christopher Steele, without the knowledge of the DOJ.
Sussman works for Perkins Coie. Perkins Coie represents Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton charged Perkins Coie to find a firm to write lies about Donald Trump. Fusion GPS was hired. Glenn Simpson, Fusion GPS CEO, hired the British spy, Christopher Steele who wrote the dossier.
Hillary Clinton fed this bogus cyber data to the FBI and the media through Michael Sussman. This was a last ditch effort to win the election. We judge this to be the same as filing a false police report, moreover, FBI agents investigated this and it was proved to be false.
This transcription page shows the link back to Hillary Clinton.
By presenting this data to the FBI, Sussmann has exposed the cyber experts to their criminality. If this were true, then at the least, it is an admission of an attempted hacking. It wasn’t true, thus, they are guilty of making a false statement to the FBI. We would be interested if agents did interview these cyber experts. We think not, for the FBI was a willing consumer of Clinton’s propaganda. If it were true, then the cyber experts would have come to the FBI directly. Perkins Coie is masking Clinton’s criminality throughout the email investigation to her election activities.
We have seen this account reported elsewhere. We thought it unlikely because of the security to enter or leave a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. It looks as though it happened.
Seems as though we were right, when we mused in our article, James Comey: an agent of chaos, “We ponder, if you as the president of the United States can’t trust the Director of the FBI, then it stands to reason, as president you can’t trust anyone in the FBI.” Comey had lied through omission to President Trump that General Flynn had lied to FBI agents. Baker is doing the same thing by not reporting Rosenstein’s offer to wear a wire to the Attorney General and President Trump.
Did he or didn’t he, that’s the question.
Which members of the president’s cabinet. Sounds like unnamed sources cited by the New York Times.
Third party, Hillary Clinton through Perkins Coie law firm?
How did the illegal surveillance begin?
So we see that it was Comey’s choice to be alone with President Trump. Later, Comey would claim inappropriate discussions took place.
Baker spills much. The Clinton and Trump investigations were both counterintelligence investigations. It would be reasonable to expect that the president would be updated on these investigations. It’s fine line between counterintelligence and counterterrorism.
That’s because Baker was duped by the Hillary Clinton machine of propaganda.
This is about Rod Rosenstein saying he would be will to wear a wire to record what the President said to him.
Taking a recording device into the oval office would be illegal because top secret information could be compromised. We wonder if all staff have to submit to a pat-down now because of this incident and the lack of any response.
The Russia mania was running wild on the 7th floor of the Hoover building. This mania was being fueled by Hillary Clinton’s and the DNC’s disinformation. However, the FBI was a willing consumer of this disinformation.
Comey and Lynch made it sound as though that the whole investigative team was in one lock-step to exonerate Hillary Clinton. That wasn’t so. How many others wanted her charged? What’s the real story as to how Baker changed his mind.
