Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Written and researched by Mark Pullen
I was surprised to see this in Lynch’s testimony. Lynch’s testimony is not supported by then, FBI employees, Lisa Page’s and Peter Strzok’s testimony, in fact, their testimony impeaches Lynch’s testimony. Page’s and Strzok’s testimony is supported by their perceived private text messages.
The perjury line is: “I had not had input in any decisions that were going to lead it one way or the other.”
This testimony of Strzok’s is supported by the false statement made by the Midyear Exam team to the Inspector General’s investigators. Also, Strzok’s testimony is supported by classified emails sent by Hillary Clinton to the Clinton Foundation. Those emails sent or caused to be sent by Clinton were breaches of U.S. statutes regarding espionage. Specifically: 18 U.S. Code § 798. (a) Disclosure of classified information.
Because of Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s banning of all scrutiny of Clinton Foundation email accounts on the Hillary Clinton email servers, and all emails sent to the Clinton Foundation, this led DOJ and FBI employees to unknowingly make this false statement to the Inspector General’s investigators, as displayed below.
Displayed below are two classified-contented emails that Hillary Clinton caused to be sent to the Clinton Foundation. Note the web addresses on the top of the emails.
I question why Bill Clinton didn’t flag this activity?
Loretta Lynch’s statement in regards to the Hillary Clinton email investigation: “I had not had input in any decisions that were going to lead it one way or the other.”
At the time when Strzok texted Page, they were both working on the Hillary Clinton email investigation. I draw your attention to the third large arrow. The order to narrowly scope from the Department of Justice had to come from Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
My question is about the extra paperwork. Was that extra paperwork due to altering records that had been generated as a result of the investigation?
Ultimately, this delay as described below by Lisa Page, allowed enough time for the destruction of evidence.
I believe those laptop computers held evidence of unauthorized disclosure of classified information to non-cleared persons.
Paul Combetta, an employee of Platte River Networks, was engaged to go to Hillary Clinton’s Lawyer’s office to Bleach-Bit wipe those laptop computers. The testimony below is contrary to Lynch’s statement before Congress.
Why wasn’t a subpoena issued for these laptop computers? I firmly believe classified information was on those laptop computers, moreover, I believe there was evidence of transmission of classified information to unauthorized persons.
Loretta Lynch’s statement in regards to the Hillary Clinton email investigation: “I had not had input in any decisions that were going to lead it one way or the other.”
The proof that the laptop computers were wiped by Paul Combetta. Note, Strzok is asking or telling Page to conceal this information from FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
Lynch’s no, no, to Nadler’s question in regards to providing protection to Hillary Clinton appears to be a false statement.
Is this poor wording on Lynch’s part? I was taught if you keep a person talking long enough, in time, they will be powerless to not tell the truth.
