Blog

I was going to write about why Russia didn’t stream-roll over Ukraine from the beginning, but today’s subject takes the lead in importance. Whether true or not, the media is reporting that White House officials are trying to determine whether President Biden should issue blanket pardons for everyone in his administration, including prominent Democrats such as Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff.

If these pardons come to pass, I believe this action is a Red Flag that the Executive Branch of our Government had a hand in the two assassination attempts on President Trump. The demonizing of President Trump by the Biden administration is a glaring admission that “They” were behind the assassination attempts on President Trump, in my opinion. The eagerness of President Biden to greet President Trump to the White House is a Red Flag in an attempt to deflect suspension from any hand in the two assassination attempts, In my opinion.

I asked Grok to give me the current news about Ryan Wesley Routh:

According to recent updates, Ryan Wesley Routh, identified as one of Donald Trump’s would-be assassins, has been active in communicating from jail. He has sent letters to various media outlets, including Politico and The Palm Beach Post, where he discusses his motivations and views, echoing Democratic rhetoric about Trump being a threat to democracy. These letters have been described as a window into a mind influenced by mainstream media narratives. Routh’s communications also mention Thomas Crooks, the first would-be assassin, and express sentiments about fighting for democracy, even suggesting a call for civil war. His letters have sparked discussions about the influence of political rhetoric on individuals’ actions.

The news also highlights Routh’s previous political activities, including donations to ActBlue, the presence of Biden-Harris stickers on his vehicle, and his outspoken anti-Trump posts on social media, which has led to debates over media bias and the understanding of his motives.

The Krassenstein brothers, Brian and Edward live in Florida. These twins have been the tip of the spear in their echoing the Democrats’ lies and rhetoric against President Trump. It appears that the Krassenstein brothers have a direct link to Democrats in the federal government. I recommend that the future FBI Director, Kash Patel, launches an investigation into whether the Krassenstein brothers provided any material support to Ryan Wesley Routh’s attempt to kill President Trump.

I asked Grok:

Shouldn’t the Democrats be joyful that Donald Trump’s nomination for the Director of the FBI is the first person of color to head the FBI?

The reaction to Donald Trump’s nomination of Kash Patel as the FBI Director varies widely, and here’s an analysis from both perspectives:

Pro-Perspective:

• Diversity and Inclusion: Some might argue that Democrats should be pleased that Trump has nominated the first person of color, Kash Patel, to head the FBI, as this could be seen as advancing diversity within high-level government positions. Advocates for diversity might see this as a positive step, highlighting the importance of representation at the highest levels of law enforcement.

• Breaking Barriers: There’s an argument that regardless of political alignment, breaking a racial barrier in such a significant role should be celebrated. This could be viewed as a historic moment for representation in government.

Con-Perspective:

• Political Alignment Over Diversity: Critics within the Democratic party and among those who oppose Trump might argue that the significance of Patel’s race is overshadowed by his political affiliations and his history of critiquing the FBI and other government agencies. There’s a concern that Patel’s loyalty to Trump might lead to the politicization of the FBI, potentially undermining its independence and integrity.

• Qualifications and Agenda: Patel’s qualifications for the role have been questioned by some, focusing on his previous roles, his outspoken criticism of the FBI, and his association with Trump’s political agenda. There’s apprehension about how he might steer the FBI, especially in terms of investigations related to Trump or his political opponents.

• Narrative vs. Reality: Some Democrats might view this nomination as a political move by Trump to deflect criticism by showcasing a diverse nomination rather than focusing on the candidate’s suitability or the potential implications for the FBI’s operations. The narrative of diversity might be seen as being used to mask what some perceive as an attempt to install a loyalist in a critical law enforcement position.

Public and Political Sentiment:

• Mixed Reactions: In reality, reactions are mixed. Some posts on X highlight the historic aspect of Patel potentially becoming the first person of color to lead the FBI, suggesting Democrats should celebrate this. However, other responses indicate skepticism, focusing more on Patel’s political alignment than on his racial background.

• Political Strategy: There’s also a strategic dimension where Democrats might be cautious about praising a Trump nomination, fearing it could be used by Trump’s supporters to claim bipartisan support or to create a false narrative of unity.

In summary, while some might argue Democrats should celebrate the historical aspect of this nomination, the political context, Patel’s background, and the implications for the FBI’s independence and public trust create a complex situation where joy is not universally felt. This nomination, like many political appointments, is seen through the lens of both diversity and political strategy, leading to a polarized response rather than unanimous celebration.

I recommend that President Trump publish any evidence that the Biden administration did directly or indirectly support the two assassination attempts on him even if the people have immunity from President Biden’s pardons.