Blog

Biden’s own standard convicts him.

And there’s Biden’s accidental confession that we have to consider too. We can’t know if Joe did or did not rape Tara Reade, but any good criminal defense lawyer would say Joe harmed his case for innocence.

Mika Brzezinski quoted what Joe had said in 2018; “For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time,” 

Mika; “Is the essence of what she is saying real? Why do you think she’s doing this?”

Joe; “I’m not going to question her motive, I’m not going to get into that at all. I don’t know why she’s saying this. I don’t know why after 27 years all of a sudden this gets raised. I don’t understand that. But I’m not going to go in and question her motive. I’m not going to attack her. She has a right to say whatever she wants to say. But I have a right to say, look at the facts, check it out. Find out if what any of what she says is true.”

I want to fair, Biden did deny strongly that he did not rape Reade. However, as the interview progressed, Biden continued to make statements that did cast doubt upon his innocence.

Green; If someone was accusing me of committing a felony sexual assault, I would question their motives as would any innocent person would do.

Blue; Here is Joe’s accidental confession to rape. What is ‘this’? What event is Joe speaking to? A doctor of psychology would say this statement is Joe’s id screaming out his guilt. The id Latin for “it”. The id is the source of a person’s bodily needs, wants, desires, and impulses, particularly their sexual and aggressive drives.

Orange; Another damaging sentence by Joe. Reade has filed rape charges against Joe. It is against the law to file a false report with law enforcement. Moreover, our slander and libel laws punish people for saying or writing something that isn’t true of a person. Why would Joe say Reade has the right to label him as a rapist?

 

The very moment when Joe lost Mika’s support.

Note Biden’s dismissive-disrespectful scoff toward Mika for her rightful question as to what he said in 2018.  

Mika was not satisfied with Biden’s response and followed up with this; “As it pertained to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, high-level Democrats said she should be believed, that they believed it happened, you said, if someone like Dr. Ford were to come out, the essence of what she is saying has to be believed, has to be real. Why? Why? Why is it real for Dr. Ford, but not for Tara Reade?”

In Joe’s response to Mika, Joe lies as to what he said as he engages in revisionary history-making. Hence, Joe does destroy what credibility he had with Mika and the American people. Note that Joe did not answer why it was real Christine Blasey Ford but not for Tara Reade. 

Joe’s response; “I’m not suggesting she had no right to come forward, any woman, they should come forward, they should be heard. And then it should be investigated. And if there’s anything that is consistent with what’s being said, and she makes the case or the case is made, then it should be believed. But only the truth matters.”

I will point out that Judge Kavanaugh managed to prove his innocence by displaying his calenders for the time period of Ford’s accusation. Kavanaugh was away at a summer athletic camp. Kavanaugh made detailed notes for every day of the month. Kavanaugh produced years of these calenders. Moreover, all of the witnesses that Ford cited denied the party took place where the alleged assault occurred.

Joe continued; “I don’t remember any type of complaint she may have made. It was 27 years ago, and I don’t remember. Nor does anyone else that I’m aware of.”

Is Joe saying he would not remember a sexual assault complaint that was made against him if it was 27 years ago?

Mika asked Joe to commit to having an independent commission to do a word search for Tara Reade among his documents at the University of Delaware. Joe said he would not allow that search and Joe said his papers contained “confidential conversations” with the president and heads of state and that he did not want them to be made public while he was actively pursuing public office.

If those are “confidential conversations”, why did Joe turn the documents over to the public University of Delaware? Joe went on to say those documents also held his prior positions on policies. By denying the public access to those documents, Joe is literally asking the voters to buy a pig in a poke. For those who do not know the meaning of pig in a poke; A pig in a poke is a thing that is bought without first being inspected, and thus of unknown authenticity or quality.

 

I will add that those aides and advisers were children at the time when the alleged rape by Biden occurred. Their words on this topic are meaningless and are disingenuous. 

Reade’s former neighbor and her brother have corroborated that Reade told them of the alleged assault after it allegedly happened. So how are we to judge if it happened or not? Let’s look at Joe’s past history as it has been captured on video and pictures.

To be fair, I present Jimmy Dore’s analysis of Joe’s interview. He is a liberal and a Democrat. I admire Mr. Dore because he is an honest broker of the truth. I urge you to watch Mr. Dore’s take on this interview, he brings up points that I didn’t.

A lawyer’s review of Biden’s interview.

Time travel; if these charges had been brought 27 years ago and I was on a jury, I would not vote to convict absent any evidence of bruising. However, if Joe made similar statements in his defense that he made in the present, I might ponder a vote of guilty in the past.

Update 5/7/2020

Lisa Bloom is a lawyer that…wait for it…litigates cases for sexual assault victims. 7.6K people approved of Ms. Bloom’s post by reposting it or liking her post. Look at all of the people that approved of Sandy Knauer’s post.

The #meToo movement is dead in that the Democrats are supporting Joe Biden by not believing Ms. Reade, or they say they believe her and they are still supporting Joe Biden. Henceforth, acknowledging their willingness to vote for a rapist and thereby betraying the sisterhood of sexual assault victims.

Both Lisa and Sandy are in writing, are telling the nation that they have no qualms in voting for a rapist to be their president. If you listen carefully, you will hear Mika’s sigh of despair as Joe evades answering her question.  

Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Written by Mark Pullen.